Jamii.one Digital Pilot
Blog post
Digitization Risks & Barriers Project Implementation

Can Digitalisation Interventions in Savings Groups Survive After the Project Ends?

Published by
Joseph Maina
June 12, 2025

What post-project drop-off taught us about building staying-power into digital record-keeping.

Key take-aways 

  • Success during a project can mask fragility. Within ten months Jamii.one supported 708  groups (24,042 members) to go digital and counted 11,887 active users each month. Yet  three months after donor funding ended, only about 15 % of those groups were still recording  meetings. 
  • Field incentives matter. When Community Digitalisation Promoters (CDPs) stopped receiving stipends, registrations plummeted; a oneday bonus campaign in January 2025 generated  2,000 meeting records, showing how tightly usage tracks payments. 
  • Transfer of knowhow is the weak link. Despite four supported meetings per group and a deliberately “use-the-groups’-own-phone” design, many groups still relied on the CDP to  drive the app. 
  • Dropoff is not unique. Other DSG Hub contributors describe similarly incremental and  uneven digital journeys and warn that enthusiasm during pilots doesn’t guarantee  scaleout. 
  • Cold data is our friend. Digital ledgers show the cliff edge in real time, forcing honest  conversations that paper systems can easily hide.

From rapid rise to sudden stop 

In January 2024, Jamii.one Foundation initiated a project to support community groups in better  managing their financial records and creating avenues for financial linkage through digital tools.  The first step involved identifying suitable individuals to champion this change within their  communities. Partnering with Caritas Kenya, Jamii.one Foundation identified potential candidates  who were passionate about digitalisation and familiar with the operations of local groups. With the  assistance of local Diocese directors and the Caritas Kenya Director, twenty-five promising  individuals were selected and interviewed, who subsequently became Community Digitalisation  Promoters (CDPs). In February, the CDPs participated in a two-day intensive training session where  they learned the intricacies of the Jamii.one app, equipping them with the knowledge and skills to  guide their groups towards digital records management. 

By December 2024 the FAHUfunded project looked like a runaway success. All project targets has  been surpassed. Groups with a total of over eleven thousand members were registering their  meetings in the app and had been doing so continuously for over three months. 

MetricTargetResult (end of project)
Groups digitalised635708
Members onboarded10,00024,042
Monthly active users10,00011,887

Yet by March 2025 Jamii.one’s dashboard lit up red. Meeting registrations had fallen by roughly 80%.  Less than one in six groups bothered to record a single transaction. The sudden silence triggered the  question behind this article: are we building castles in the air, or can savingsgroup digitalisation  stick once the project trucks drive away? 

What we tried to build in 

Our goal was to enhance the digital literacy of savings group members by promoting the utilisation  of the Jamii.one Platform as an alternative to conventional paper ledgers, targeting 10,000 (new and  existing Community Saving Group members) by applying the below strategies: 

  1. Local champions: Local champions, not outsiders. 25 CDPs were recruited from within  dioceses they already served. 
  2. Groupowned devices: Each group was encouraged to register using its own smartphone to  promote ownership and accountability. Through Jamii.Insights, we closely tracked the  phone used during group registration and flagged any cases where CDP phone was used,  ensuring those registrations were redone using the group’s own phone number. By year end, all newly registered groups were created using group-owned devices, not CDP phones.
  3. Four guided meetings: CDPs stayed until the group could run four consecutive meetings  alone—mirroring DreamStart Labs’ “digitalchampion” tip.
  4. Offlinefirst design: The app works without data, autosyncing when coverage returns.
  5. Close monitoring and support:; Weekly meetings where set up. Here, CDPs shared updates,  challenges, and plans for the week. This allowed Jamii.one to quickly identify gaps and offer  targeted support. This was reinforced by monthly oneonone checkins with each CDP  which gave a deeper view of individual CDP performance and support needs,Finally, end of-month reviews were held witht he local partner which ensured alignment, addressed  emerging issues, and allowed for timely resource adjustments.as needed.

These measures, however, did not prevent the crash.

Hypotheses for the post-project cliff 

Experiencing this drop-off in spite of all the strategies applied begs the question: what is standing in  the way of sustained digital adoption. Some of the hypotheses we are working with include:  

Hypothesis 

What we hypothesise 

Early evidence

End-user incentive  not high enough

Benefits of digitalisation; efficiency, automatic  calculation, transparency, safe record storage – alone, does not present a high enough incentive to  keep groups hooked.

Microinsurance linkages were  announced but postponed,  denting excitement.

Knowledge is not  

transferred 

CDPs did not train the groups to register  

independently, but instead visited and conducted  the registrations for them. Despite strong guidance  that groups should handle registration themselves,  this did not happen.

CDP stipends stopped on  31 Dec 2024. Meeting  

registrations fell the very next  month.

Training ≠ mastering 

Fourmeeting model may be too shallow to build  confidence in the groups to conduct registrations  independently. 

Case stories still describe  reliance on CDPs months later.

One smartphone per  group is not enough

Even if groups registered some meetings  

themselves, relying on just one smartphone creates  risk. If the phone is lost, out of battery, unavailable,  or offline, the group cannot register or upload data.

86% of groups were registering  using a none-CDP phone, yet,  when stipends stopped, as did  registrations. 

Financial incentive  structure blocks  

sustainability

Although CDPs may want the best for the groups,  transferring registration to the group threatens their  role and income. As long as agents are paid to  register meetings, they may avoid building group  independence.

Registrations stopped with the  end of stipends. Oneday  performance bonus in  

Jan 2025 produced 2,000  registrations—eight times the  daily average.

Ghost groups inflate  baselines

It is well-known that not all groups that are  recorded to exist, in fact exist when we start to  require one profile per person with full name and  phone number. 

Duplicate or false groups were  identified during quality  

checks and may remain in the  dataset, exaggerating the  apparent drop in activity.

Most likely, the explanation for the decline is a combination of these hypotheses and more.

Is 15% really a failure? 

Some practitioners argue that any voluntary tech adoption after subsidised support is a win, citing  historic “patient optimism” in microfinance rollouts. We agree that digital journeys are incremental,  but if 85% of groups abandon the tool, few funders will keep paying for the journey. 

From Manual Struggles to Digital Success: How Jamii.One  Transformed Starlight 24 into a Model SILC Group in Nakuru Diocese  

The group started in 2021 based on the SILC programme in Nakuru County. At first, they faced a lot of  mistrust from the community. This was due to several other groups in the area having failed. 

Despite this, Starlight 24 became one of the most stable SILC groups, with twenty-five members.  Over time, the members had a strong impact. They influenced others in the community to join SILC  groups, start saving, and support each other during emergencies. This has been evident in several recent cases.
Before Jamii.one, this group used to spend about one hour on their meetings. Time taking manual accounting would often drag out meeting and make members arrive home late. Jamii.one introduced a better service. Digital record keeping and automatic calculations reduced meeting time. It also helps with faster summation of savings and interest, and ensures the group’s records are stored safely. The change has made the group more lively. Members are even eager to be the one whose phone is used to fill in the group’s data.

Beyond the project: redesigning for stickiness 

  • Develop a model where during the project, agents remuneration is not from digitalisation but for supporting transferring digital literacy to the groups. And post-project, there is a  continuous financial incentive for agents to continue to support groups e.g. through  commercial sales like financial product linkage.
  • Name and train two “tech champions” per group. DreamStart Labs’ pilots show champions  halve support calls. Top 10 Tips for Running a Great Digital Savings Group Pilot
  • Pair digital recordkeeping with an immediate win. For Jamii.one, that is the March 2025  launch of the Britam microinsurance bundle; groups that pay premiums through the app  will have a builtin reason to keep recording. 
  • Make the dropoff visible. Share realtime dashboards with donors and partners so  coursecorrections happen before the endline survey. 

Take Action: questions for your next DSG pilot 

  • What happens on Day 366? Map postfunding user journeys before the kickoff workshop.
  • Who loses a job if groups can selfrecord? Long-term collaboration with agents through  financial products offering and digitalisation as a means to access the products.
  • Can every signer operate the app with the data turned off? Hand over the phone and find  out. 
  • What “hook product” will keep the group coming back? Savings, insurance, marketplace— pick one and launch it fast. 

Conclusion 

Digital ledgers give us unprecedented transparency, but they also expose uncomfortable truths. The data from Kenya suggests that technology alone cannot outlive the project cycle. Until local  incentives, ownership, and immediate value are built into the model, postproject dropoff will remain the challenge of promising pilots. It’s important that we share difficult lessons openly. Only  then can we work together to find practical solutions that overcome barriers and help digital savings groups grow in resilience and prosperity. What have you learned? Share it with us below.

 

About the Author(s)
Joseph Maina
Jamii.one Foundation, Copenhagen Denmark info@jamiionefoundation.org www.jamiione-foundation.org

Leave a Reply

View all comments

Related Blog Posts

Read
blog_post
Consumer Protection Financial Products & Services FinTech Innovation
Micro Equity Blog Photo DreamStart Labs scaled
blog_post
Consumer Protection Financial Products & Services FinTech Innovation

Sharing the Risk: “Micro Equity” for Savings Groups in the Digital Era

By Philip Acton,
November 21, 2022

Sharing the Risk: “Micro Equity” for Savings Groups in the Digital Era

This blog post explores Micro Equity – an investment product for savings groups designed and implemented by DreamStart Labs, a DSG technology vendor.
Read
blog_post
Digital Transformation Digitization Benefits Digitization Risks & Barriers
DSG Blog Post No. 1
blog_post
Digital Transformation Digitization Benefits Digitization Risks & Barriers

Welcome to the DSG Hub—the Global Destination for the Digital Savings Group Community!

By Dennis Mello & Paula Rudnicka
May 24, 2022

Welcome to the DSG Hub—the Global Destination for the Digital Savings Group Community!

This blog post, written by co-managers of the DSG Hub project at Global Communities, offers insights about why the Hub was created and how to get involved.